Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added first draft of EventStoreDB consumer #189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Added first draft of EventStoreDB consumer #189

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

oskardudycz
Copy link
Collaborator

@oskardudycz oskardudycz commented Feb 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Added EventStoreDB customer abstraction on top of catch up subscription to $all.

It's not perfect, lacks:

  • abstractions for checkpointing,
  • proper batching,
  • retries in case of subscription disconnection,
  • subscribing to specific streams,
  • passing esdb subscription options.

I'll also rename the subscription to processors.

But it works, and those changes are kinda orthogonal, so why not merge it, aye?

@oskardudycz oskardudycz force-pushed the esdb_consumer branch 2 times, most recently from 58ef231 to 68a2860 Compare February 12, 2025 20:42
@oskardudycz oskardudycz added this to the 0.29.0 milestone Feb 12, 2025
@oskardudycz oskardudycz marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 20:55
@oskardudycz oskardudycz merged commit e6ded8b into main Feb 12, 2025
3 checks passed
@oskardudycz oskardudycz deleted the esdb_consumer branch February 12, 2025 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
consumers enhancement New feature or request EventStoreDB
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.29.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@oskardudycz